Borabora Ltd., a manufacturer of fast-moving goods within Nairobi, planned to construct a warehouse in Mombasa to
serve as a distribution point for the coast region. The company intended to make a saving on transportation costs by
using rail transport to move the finished goods to the coastal warehouse, instead of the traditional road transport.
The chief finance officer of Borabora Ltd., Eric Mambo, recommended Ujenzi. Ltd., a construction company for the
contract to construct the warehouse. However, when the contract was signed, Ujenzi Ltd. was not authorised to conduct
business. This is because the government had revoked Ujenzi Ltd.’s license indefinitely, based on recent bidding
irregularities and failure to observe construction standards. Eric Mambo knew that Ujenzi Ltd.’s license had been
revoked yet recommended the company because he was receiving a commission and had some beneficial interest in
the company.
The cost of the warehouse was also overstated deliberately to pass some of the money back to Eric Mambo. Eric
Mambo recommended an adjustment to the accounting records to make the extra payments appear like transaction fees
payable to a consultancy company that he owns.
Required:
Advise the management of Borabora Ltd. on THREE illegal activities that may necessitate a forensic investigation in
the company.
Answers and Explanations are locked.
Login to View Answer